------Citation------
Fullerton, Ticky, dir. Interview with Philip Rosedale . Four Corners, 2007.
---Summery---
The interview speaks of how virtual economies actually gain relevance in the R.L. simple because of the value that we give it. In the same manner that the world estimates the value of every form of currency, so does it estimate MMO currency. Now depending on the world will depend on the economic trade items and the value of the currency. Just like America imports goods from china, the MMO will do the same. But in short, we must stop looking at the VR or MMO as just a game or escape and realize that they are their own country with imperfections and reality.
---Evaluation---
-Who?-
Who is the publisher of the source or the sponsor of the site? Is it a corporation, a scholarly organization, a professional association, a government agency, or an issue-oriented group? Have you heard of this publisher or sponsor before? Does it seem reputable and responsible? Is it considered academic or popular?
The publisher of this interview are sponsored by Four Corners, whom appear to be a small new organization. From the links and general search I have concluded that this organization is considered small. From the interview themselves and the other information on the site, one can see that this information has some validity. But its not clear if this is academic or pop.
-What?-
What bias or point of view might affect the reliability of the source?
The given publishers do not show any manipulated point of view and the people interview are all from different perspectives. So one can safely say that any bias found has an oppose or something to balance the interviews.
-When?-
When was the source published or created? is its information current?
This source was created in 2007 but has not been updated since. This does not hurt the credibility but requires the individual to hunt for some updated information.
-Where?-
Where have you found your source?
This source came from the English comp. pals link.
-Why?-
Why should you use this source rather than others?
THIS Source was recommended by the instructor.
-How?-
How would its information add to your paper? How would it help answer your research question and provide compelling evidence to persuade your readers.
At the current standard of information, the quality, and its relevance; the source is best used as a to simply describe the topic.
----Interview with Clay Shirky----
Fullerton, Ticky, dir. Interview with Clay Shirky. Four Corners, 2007.
---Summery---
REALITY IS PERSPECTIVE AND NO TWO PEOPLE SEE THE SAME THING!!!! LOOK AT HISTORY AND SEE THAT ALL OF THIS HAS HAPPEN BEFORE AND WILL HAPPEN AGAIN!!!!! WHY AM I SCREAMING?
---Evaluation---
-Who?-
Who is the publisher of the source or the sponsor of the site? Is it a corporation, a scholarly organization, a professional association, a government agency, or an issue-oriented group? Have you heard of this publisher or sponsor before? Does it seem reputable and responsible? Is it considered academic or popular?
The publisher of this interview are sponsored by Four Corners, whom appear to be a small new organization. From the links and general search I have concluded that this organization is considered small. From the interview themselves and the other information on the site, one can see that this information has some validity. But its not clear if this is academic or pop.
-What?-
What bias or point of view might affect the reliability of the source?
The given publishers do not show any manipulated point of view and the people interview are all from different perspectives. So one can safely say that any bias found has an oppose or something to balance the interviews.
-When?-
When was the source published or created? is its information current?
This source was created in 2007 but has not been updated since. This does not hurt the credibility but requires the individual to hunt for some updated information.
-Where?-
Where have you found your source?
This source came from the English comp. pals link.
-Why?-
Why should you use this source rather than others?
THIS Source was recommended by the instructor.
-How?-
How would its information add to your paper? How would it help answer your research question and provide compelling evidence to persuade your readers.
At the current standard of information, the quality, and its relevance; the source is best used as a to simply describe the topic.
(side note for readers: Yes i just copied and pasted the same evaluation for both summaries but my reasoning behind this lazy move is that both are the same. What i am trying to say is that i would rather be honest then fabricate different ways of saying the same thing.)
